Sunday Scan

No Fireworks In Gualala

A couple weeks back, I wrote about a particularly worrisome matter of the Cal. Coastal Commission issuing a cease and desist order against a 4th of July fireworks show planned in the No. Cal town of Gualala. It is, I think, the foothold the Coastal Commission has been seeking in a larger effort to stop these patriotic displays all along the California Coast.

How crazy is that? This crazy: One of the Gualala Gaeans said in a comment on the post that the damage of a 15 minute fireworks show would be permanent and unmitigatable. My gosh, if the earth were really that fragile, if would have dissolved into dust long ago.

The Gualala Patriots Day Committee (the good guys) appealed the decision and lost, so there will be no fireworks show this year. But the fight goes on; the judge merely failed to overturn the cease and desist; he did not rule on the underlaying matter. Says the Pacific Legal Foundation, which is representing the Patriots Day group:

“The legal fight goes on against this abuse of power by the California Coastal Commission. Although the fireworks won’t happen this year, our lawsuit goes forward. We’ll be litigating to bring the fireworks back in future years – and to have the courts instruct the Coastal Commission on the proper limits of its power.”

For a PLF summary on the case, click here.

The Inevitable In Zimbabwe

The despotic leaders of the multitude of thug-ocracies of the world can breathe a sigh of relief — the popular uprising against their role model hero, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, has been crushed.

This was a close one, with Morgan Tsvangirai of the Movement for Democratic Change actually winning a popular election. But Mugabe froze the election results and started a campaign of intimidation … which may be too faint a word. Remember what Mugabe’s supporters did to the wife of Patson Chipiro, a MDC regional leader?

They grabbed Mrs Chipiro and chopped off one of her hands and both her feet. Then they threw her into her hut, locked the door and threw a petrol bomb through the window. (BBC)

Preceding the MDC announcement it was not going to participate in the new election was this, also from BBC:

On Sunday, the MDC was due to stage a rally in Harare – the highlight of the campaign.

But supporters of Mr Mugabe’s Zanu-PF occupied the stadium venue and roads leading up to it.

Witnesses reported seeing hundreds of youths around the venue wielding sticks, some chanting slogans, and others circling the stadium crammed onto the backs of trucks.

Some set upon opposition activists, leaving a number badly injured, the MDC said.

It said African election monitors were also chased away from the rally site.

Sounds like exactly the sort of election Jimmy Carter would deem to be fair.

Another Reason To Vote For McCain

Buried deep in a WaPo story on hate groups and rising racism that’s very short on stats and figures and verrrry loooong on opinion, we find this:

“One person put it this way: Obama for president paves the way for David Duke as president,” said Duke, who ran for president in 1988, received less than 1 percent of the vote and has since spent much of his time in Europe. “This is finally going to make whites begin to realize it’s a necessity to stick up for their own heritage, and that’s going to make them turn to people like me. We’re the next logical step.”

Keep Duke in Europe! Vote McCain!

Alternative Energy Dreamin’

There’s another horse in the alternative energy race … but this one seems unlikely to generate even one horsepower. But what the heck! Don’t stop believin’, hold on to that feelin’:

Scientists from Europe’s Atomic Energy Commission, in Grenoble, France, have shown that vibrations from raindrops landing on a certain type of plastic can generate enough energy to operate some low-power wireless sensors, like battery-powered outdoor thermometers.

Leonardo diCaprio, take note!

Plenty Magazine offers an “In Depth” feature on the new technology, gushing about how it could be used to power climate sensing devices that now need batteries, so that we get a continuous flow of data to feed into the electricity sucking beasts we call computers.

Of course, rain drop power comes with that bane of all alternative energy: a dearth of economic viability. It takes Penty to the last paragraph to mention this tidbit: The material used to generate raindrop power costs $460 for 1 kilogram, and given the milliwatts produced, a bunch of kilograms will be required. Batteries, on the other hand, cost a buck.

Undaunted, the article ends:

Who knows, April showers may soon bring power.

Of course, not enough power to offset the solar power that’s not being generated due to the rain.

Very nice art: Josh Cochran

Extreme Climate Change

NOAA (named, perhaps, for that ark chap, since the oceans are going to flood us all) has released its newest climate change report, Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate. The resulting bad reporting can perhaps be best summarized by two quick cuts.

First, the pocket liner set got their first impression of the report from this Science Digest intro:

Among the major findings reported in this assessment are that droughts, heavy downpours, excessive heat, and intense hurricanes are likely to become more commonplace as humans continue to increase the atmospheric concentrations of heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

While the mainstream tuned into this Digg summary …

New report highlights the likely changes in extreme weather and climate conditions under ongoing climate change.

… which in turn generated comments like:

Report: Turning on lamp will light up room.
Report: Pissing into wind will get you wet.
Report: Falling linked to failure to stand upright.

How many of these stories do we need to read before people start seeing this as completely obvious?!

Well, of course, it’s just not that obvious. ICECAP gives us this summary by Roger Pielke Jr., who just happens to believe in anthropogenic global warming:

The report contains several remarkable conclusions, that somehow did not seem to make it into the official press release. They include: over the long-term U.S. hurricane landfalls have been declining, nationwide there have been no long-term increases in drought, despite increases in some measures of precipitation, there have not been corresponding increases in peak streamflows, there have been no observed changes in the occurrence of tornadoes or thunderstorms, there have been no long-term increases in strong East Coast winter storms (ECWS), called Nor’easters, there are no long-term trends in either heat waves or cold spells, though there are trends within shorter time periods in the overall record.

Pshaw. What’s the fun in reporting boring ol’ stuff like that?

Seismic Mitigation As Art

This amazing piece of industrial art is actually the tuned mass damper at the top of Taipei 101, for now the planet’s tallest completed skyscraper.

The 728-ton steel ball is so massive it couldn’t be lifted into location; rather, it had to be assembled in a cavern carved out of four stories at the top of the tower. Why, you might well ask, put a 728-ton ball at the top of the building?

The simple answer is that Taipei 101 stands just 800 feet from an earthquake fault. More specific: The ball swings counter to motion caused by wind or earth movement, dampening sway.

Deputy Dog, an architecture blog, has a short story on the mass damper, but what really attracts is the video that was shot on May 12, when shocks from China’s massive earthquake hit the tower. Tourists in the building actually flocked up to the viewing area for the damper to see it in action.

Don’t you just love human ingenuity?

Can You Say “Semper Cheese?”

If you don’t understand this, says Blackfive, you’ve never met a Marine.

Zimbabwe: The Case For No U.N.

Here I thought the United Nations was supposed to protect the world’s downtrodden, but, Holy Cow, it appears they are too busy quibbling over the wording of documents on human rights and passing resolutions condemning Israel for wanting to continue to exist to actually care about people.

Why do we even bother to have a U.N. when one day’s news brings these two stories?

The men who pulled up in three white pickup trucks were looking for Patson Chipiro (pictured), head of the Zimbabwean opposition party in Mhondoro district. His wife, Dadirai, told them he was in Harare but would be back later in the day, and the men departed.

An hour later they were back. They grabbed Mrs Chipiro and chopped off one of her hands and both her feet. Then they threw her into her hut, locked the door and threw a petrol bomb through the window. (Times of London)

And this:

Zimbabwean authorities confiscated a truck loaded with 20 tons of American food aid for poor schoolchildren and ordered that the wheat and pinto beans aboard be handed out to supporters of President Robert Mugabe at a political rally instead, the American ambassador said Wednesday. (Times of New York)

Robert Mugabe has given the world more than enough lessons in why he should not be allowed to remain in power in Zimbabwe. By his hand, his country lies in ruin, thousands of graves are filled with people whose only crime was to question his government, and hunger for hope competes with hunger for food as the national past-time. But the U.N. lets him rule, pretending that the recent toss-up election was somehow fair and Mugabe somehow has a continuing right to leadership.

As evidence, Sec Gen Ban Ki-moon met with Mugabe recently in Rome for a little chat (Obama supporters take note), and now is dispatching a senior emissary to the country:

Haile Menkerios, Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs, is expected to visit Zimbabwe from next Monday until 20 June, a spokesperson for Mr. Ban announced today.

Mr. Menkerios will discuss the political situation and the upcoming presidential election – which is scheduled to take place on 27 June – while in the Southern African country. (UN News)

And what will come of that? Another report that says things are bad in Zimbabwe? Great. Try to find room for it on the shelf. How about this for an alternative?

Prior to the election, Banki can get behind the mikes and say that if Mugabe is re-elected or otherwise continues to hold onto power, he will push for Zimbabwe to be expelled from the United Nations as a “worthless state.” So much for aid and assistance.

Then all the UN Peacekeepers in the area can be re-routed to Zimbabwe temporarily (giving the local populations of young girls and boys in the countries the Peacekeepers come from some blessed relief), in order to present an armed presence at the polls — with shoot to kill orders for anyone attempting to disrupt the election.

Then, the UN could collect all the ballots and with international oversight, count them.

Then, the results in hand, they could arrest Robert Mugabe and his henchmen and ferry them off to The Hague for their trial as criminals against humanity.

In my dreams. The Mugabes of the world exist because the UN exists, giving them a legitimacy they don’t deserve … which is pretty easy to do, since the UN steeps in legitimacy it doesn’t deserve.

Sunday Scan

Happy Passover

Passover started with the Sabbath yesterday, so my best wishes to all my Jewish friends on this remarkable and holy holiday.

And my thanks to Ask.com for illustrating its home page this morning with the artwork above. And what about Google? Nothing of course. Why do they so fear religion? Ask has honored religion for as long as I’ve used it, and so far, the Secularists have not rebelled against it.

Neither has God’s wrath poured down on Google, but I know that if the Googleites were living in Egypt back in the times of Passover, a plague would fall upon it.

Giving Greenies The Sack

Knee-jerk central — that’s the Bay Area, home of ill-thought out political actions and decisions made on the emotion of the moment, like last year’s action by Oakland to ban plastic bags in retail stores with annual sales of $1 million or more.

Nexis sent me to a June 2007 SF Wrongicle article heralding the passage of the ban:

Under the measure sponsored by Councilwomen Nancy Nadel and Jean Quan, any retailer grossing more than $1 million a year would be banned from using the nonbiodegradable plastic bags. Nadel said that 10 percent of petroleum is used to create plastic so that reducing the use of bags will help the environment in multiple ways.

“Californians use 19 billion plastic disposable bags each year, and throw away 600 every second,” Nadel said. “These bags are made from oil, so reducing their use will serve the mission of the ‘Oil Independent Oakland by 2020’ ” task force established last year.

Them’s some mighty fine knee-jerk stats. But now, as a judge temporarily suspends the order, we find that once again environmentalists are fueled more by emotion than fact. Here’s the Oakland Trib:

A Superior Court judge issued a tentative ruling Thursday placing an injunction on Oakland’s plastic-bag ban, saying the city should have more adequately studied the environmental impact of the ban before passing it into law.

Judge Frank Roesch’s ruling came after a plastic-bag industry group called the Coalition to Support Plastic Bag Recycling sued Oakland last summer shortly after the City Council approved a ban on single-use plastic bags at retail stores doing more than $1 million a year in business. The judge heard arguments in the case in January.

The ban was billed as an environmentally friendly ordinance. But at the crux of the case was a question on whether the increased use of paper bags could harm the environment as well.

Paper bags take more energy to create and fill up more landfill space, the plastic-bag industry argued.

“The court … finds that substantial evidence in the record supports at least a fair argument that single-use paper bags are more damaging than single-use plastic bags,” Roesch wrote.

To go on with their ban, the Oakland City Council would now have to authorize a full-blown Environmental Impact Report to study the environmental effects of the ban — at a cost of at last $100,000 in a down economy. It is quite possible the knee-jerkers will win, and $100,000 that could be used for something useful will be sacrificed on to the Greenie Gods.

A High Rate Of Cynicism

The always-interesting Stats delivered this a.m.:

The three-
component Maslach Burnout Inventory-
General Survey was implemented to examine burnout among newspaper journalists (N = 770). With a moderate rate of exhaustion, a high rate of cynicism and a moderate rate of professional efficacy, burnout among journalists demonstrate higher rates of burnout than previous work. Additionally, journalists expressing intentions to leave the profession (n = 173) demonstrated high rates of exhaustion and cynicism, and moderate rates of professional efficacy, making them “at-risk” for burnout. (Read more)

Sounds like me when I left journalism … except that my “high rate of cynicism” was directed at how cynical my editors and colleagues were, not at the world in general.

What’s illuminating here is that the burned-out journalists don’t leave to become fig growers or car salesmen; they just keep reporting, delivering us news through a cynical, exhausted filter.

Sequestered Carbon News

Kudos to the Bush Admin for keeping Warmie hysteria in check during international talks that are a precursor to the next big UN global warming inititives.

There are plenty of nations there that want to set a goal of halving greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, including the EU nations, Japan and Canada (which most any way you slice it would benefit from global warming). But the US is only “seriously considering” the goal under Bush, and by refusing to endorse it, effectively is preventing the establishment of such a destructive goal.

Meanwhile, buried 12 paragraphs deep in the Reuters story was this:

France said that South Africa presented studies suggesting it would cost the world up to $200 billion a year to curb greenhouse gases and between $30 and $60 billion a year to adapt to effects such as droughts or rising seas.

No further discussion merited, apparently — including no question about why France would bring up the South African study and still support a 50% greenhouse gas reduction target.

China 1: It’s Not Just Tibet

China is becoming the global leader in thuggery, not just suppressing freedom in Tibet, but lending its hand to ruthless, blood-soak dictators across the globe.

Here’s the latest unsurprising update, from The (UK) Independent:

Chinese troops have been seen on the streets of Zimbabwe’s third largest city, Mutare, according to local witnesses. They were seen patrolling with Zimbabwean soldiers before and during Tuesday’s ill-fated general strike called by the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).

Earlier, 10 Chinese soldiers armed with pistols checked in at the city’s Holiday Inn along with 70 Zimbabwean troops.

One eyewitness, who asked not to be named, said: “We’ve never seen Chinese soldiers in full regalia on our streets before. The entire delegation took 80 rooms from the hotel, 10 for the Chinese and 70 for Zimbabwean soldiers.”

So the next time you’re all sympatico with some left-wing acquaintance because your positions over China and Tibet align, raise this one: “Have you spoken out against China’s involvement in Zimbabwe and Venezuela?” And watch the blank stare.

China 2: Fixing The Weather

One of the biggest challenges facing the Beijing Olympics — besides cerain human rights issues — is the weather. Why? Well, here’s Beijing weather in a nutshell:

Winter is marked by howling Siberian winds; summer, by sweltering monsoon heat. In lieu of showers, springtime is best known for seasonal dust storms that sweep down from Central Asia. Fall is parched and gusty too, but the dust settles down.

Overlay on all this industrial pollution the likes of which we haven’t seen since the English midlands at the peak of the industrial revolution, then factor in the 50% chance of rain expected for the opening ceremonies, and you get the picture.

China is responding by stepping up its long-term, large-scale (52,998 employees) programs of industrial weather alteration. It’s a troubling, wild, 5-clicker of a story at Plenty that makes a good Sunday read.

China 3: Wei, Way Out

Blogger secret revealed: I sometimes right about stuff I don’t understand at all. Like the work of Chinese artist Li Wei (should we give him a little leeway?), which is described at Hemmy.net as as:

Chinese artist Li Wei from Beijing started off his performance series ‘Mirroring’ and later on took off attention with his ‘Falls’ series which shows the artist with his head and chest embedded into the ground. His work is a mixture of performance art and photography that creates illusions of a sometimes dangerous reality. Li Wei states that these images are not computer montages and works with the help of props such as mirror, metal wires, scaffolding and acrobatics.

Got that? Not a computer montage, just some props, mirrors, wires and acrobatics. Then how do you explain this:

More images here.

China Helping Mugabe Crush Opposition

Because I’ve been writing a lot about China’s repression of Tibet lately, I’ve been getting a fair amount of hate comments from yellow journalists China supporters. I wonder if they support this:

A Chinese ship anchored outside Durban port in South Africa earlier this week with a consignment of arms for Zimbabwe, where a bloody crackdown on the opposition is in full swing.

An investigative magazine, Noseweek, raised the alert Wednesday, saying the An Yue Yiang was waiting for permission to offload 70 tonnes of weapons for transport by road to Zimbabwe.

The shipment comprised millions of rounds of ammunition for AK-47 assault rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, grenade launchers, and mortar bombs and tubes, Noseweek editor Martin Welz, who saw the shipping manifest, said.

Customs officials confirmed that the ship was carrying arms. The ship’s captain confirmed to SAPA news agency he had cargo for Zimbabwe.

According to Welz, the shipment was paid for in January, two months before Zimbabwe’s disputed elections.

But the timing of the delivery, coming amid mounting reports of ‘revenge’ attacks by Zanu-PF supporters on supporters of the rival Movement for Democratic Change, has raised fears the weapons, even if part of a routine order, could be used against civilians. (source)

Mugabe should be leaving office, having lost an election fair and square before his party made the results indecisive, unfair and unsquare. Instead, he is clinging to his job, despite having utterly ruined one of Africa’s finest countries through his greed and corruption.

And what does China — the country my commenters would have us believe is the victim of the Tibetans instead of the other way around — do at this critical juncture? Do they support the people? Of course not!

They support the man who is poised to brutally repress his own people, like an acorn that hasn’t fallen far from the China tree.

Sunday Scan

Birds (Vultures?) Of A Feather

Why are we not surprised by this bit of news from Fars, the Iranian news propaganda-wire?

TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad here Sunday voiced Tehran’s support for Zimbabwe’s independence and progress, and called for the utilization of all the ample potentials existing for the expansion of Tehran-Harare cooperation.

According to a report released by the Presidential Press Office, the president made the remarks in a meeting with Zimbabwe’s new ambassador to Tehran, where he underscored that Tehran perceives no limit to the expansion of ties with Harare. …

Ahmadinejad praised resistance of the Iranian and Zimbabwean nations against bullying powers, and reiterated, “Iran strongly supports the rights, independence and progress of the Zimbabwean nation.”

For his part, the envoy appreciated Iran’s support for the Zimbabwean nation against the bullying powers’ aggressions, and underlined Harare’s resolve to develop all-out ties with Iran and use Tehran’s valuable experiences in the various grounds.

Proof here that you can tell a person’s character by the company he keeps. The two nations may wish to pause to ask the all-important question: “Why are they bullying us?”

The Betty Windsor Channel

Queen Elizabeth has gone digital, with her own page on YouTube. Until they post her new Christmas message, you can view her first televised message, from 1957, in which she looks up from her written notes and says,

Happy Christmas.

She then looks down at her notes to refresh her memory, and adds,

Twenty-five years ago, my grandfather broadcast the first of these Christmas messages. Today is another landmark because television has made it possible for many of you to see me in your homes on Christmas day.

In 2007, thanks to The Royal Channel, the Official Channel of the British Monarchy, you’ll be able to catch Queen Betty on your Iphone at “approximately 3 pm. GMT on Christmas day.” In the meantime, you can stay pumped viewing such videos as The Prince of Wales Visits the Robert Clack School, Part 1, on the frivolous side and The Queen and Her Prime Minister on the really rather interesting side. It’s not every day, after all, you get to hear John Majors talking about the ambiance in these private meetings, “with Corgies scattered about.”

But don’t expect to find clips of Betty in her bedroom like you’d expect elsewhere on YouTube. This is the Royal Channel, after all, and the real Queen Elizabeth, whomever she may be, is nowhere to be found.

God … By The Numbers

You can tell a person’s perspective on faith by whether they use the words “expressions of faith” or “religiosity” in a sentence like this one:

Our analysis of thousands of public communications across eight decades shows that American politics today is defined by a calculated, demonstrably public _______ unlike anything in modern history.

Kevin Coe and David Domke used “religiosity,” so we can suspect how they feel about the rising tide of expressions of faith in campaigning today. But that doesn’t take anything away from their article on History News Network, Think Religion Plays a Bigger Role in Politics Today? Y ou’re Right. Statistics Prove it.

Coe and Domke point to Reagan’s acceptance speech in 1980, when he requested a moment of silent prayer, as the starting point for an era they describe statistically as follows:

If one looks at nearly 360 major speeches that presidents from Franklin Roosevelt to George W. Bush have given, the increase in religiosity is astounding. The average president from FDR to Carter mentioned God in a minority of his speeches, doing so about 47% of the time. Reagan, in contrast, mentioned God in 96% of his speeches. George H. W. Bush did so 91% of the time, Clinton 93%, and the current Bush (through year six) was at 94%. Further, the total number of references to God in the average presidential speech since 1981 is 120% higher than the average speech from 1933-1980. References to broader religious terms, such as faith, pray, sacred, worship, crusade, and dozens of others increased by 60%.

Presidential requests for divine favor also show a profound shift. The phrase “God Bless America,” now the signature tagline of American politics, gained ubiquity in the 1980s. Prior to 1981, the phrase had only once passed a modern president’s lips in a major address: Richard Nixon’s, as he concluded an April 30, 1973, speech about the Watergate scandal. Since Reagan, presidents have rarely concluded a major address without “God Bless America” or a close variant.

What impresses me most in this statement is that those who would have us believe that America is not a Christian nation must deal with the fact that presidents from Roosevelt to Carter, who apparently did not espouse “religiosity,” mentioned God in 47 percent of their speeches.

How do you account for that, other than by agreeing that America is, in fact, a Christian nation?

Another Floating Cross

clipped from www.youtube.com

In this clip (which really isn’t worth your time viewing) from California’s premier conservative political news blog, Flash Report, we see a surprised Cal. Senate Republican leader Dick Ackerman wishing us a Christmas greeting as Flash Report publisher Jon Fleishman drops by for an unexpected visit.

As Fleishman leaves, there is a cross by the inside of the front door, above Ackerman’s right shoulder. It seems the “floating cross” introduced by Mike Huckabee is taking the nation by a storm ….

You Must Follow Proper Channels!

Over at the leftist blog Media Matters, we are supposed to be upset because Fox News sourced a story to a … a … a … blog!

On December 21, the front page of FoxNews.com contained a headline under the “LATEST NEWS” tab that read “Report: Over 400 Scientists Dispute Man-Made Warming.” However, the purported “LATEST NEWS” item did not link to a news report but, rather, to a post on “The Inhofe EPW Press Blog,” the blog of Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), ranking minority member on the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

The horror! Unable to say anything to defend the Doctrine of Warmism Infallibility from this nailing of the Thesis of 400 to the digital door of the Church of Warmism, Media Matters can only attack the media, not the message.

Which is why Media Matters doesn’t.

hat-tip: Greenie Watch

The Unicyclists And The Feminists

Think a unicycle can teach you nothing about radical feminism? Think again.

A study by a unicycling British professor seeks to trace the causes of humor (to male aggressiveness, it turns out), but along the way trounces the feminist dogma that differences between men and women are environmental, not genetic.

Here’s a bit of Science Daily’s write-up of the research paper:

Professor Sam Shuster conducted a year long study observing how people reacted to him as he unicycled through the streets of Newcastle upon Tyne. What began as a hobby turned into an observational study after he realized that the huge number of stereotypical and predictable responses he received must be indicative of an underlying biological phenomenon.

The study was an observation of people’s reactions to a sudden unexpected exposure to a new phenomenon – in this case unicycling, which at the time few had seen. He documented the responses of over 400 individuals, and observed the responses of many others.

Over 90% of people responded physically, for example with an exaggerated stare or a wave. Almost half responded verbally — more men than women. Here, says Professor Shuster, the sex difference was striking. 95% of adult women were praising, encouraging or showed concern. There were very few comic or snide remarks. In contrast, only 25% of adult men responded as did the women, for example, by praise or encouragement; instead 75% attempted comedy, often snide or combative as an intended put-down.

Shuster concluded, correctly I think, that the intense aggressiveness of young males, many of whom would try to knock him off his unicycle, was masked with age by biting humor. Caustic, sarcastic, aggressive humor remains the domain of men … and Rosie.

But why would women react nurturingly to a unicycle, something none of us are exposed to much as we grow? Could it be that women are … nurturing? And that men are aggressive?

If you are a radical feminist, you can try to discount this via the old toy guns vs. toy dolls arguments, but really, unicycles? Unicycles don’t carry a societal perception that is either aggressive or passive; they are merely different, and therefore draw out a purer reaction, a reaction that shows very clearly how different men and women are.

Ron Paul’s Biggest Applause Line

Tucker Carlson must be on the outs at MSNBC (and that’s the outs of the outs, if ever there was such a thing) because he was recently tasked not just to follow Ron Paul around for a couple days, but to follow him around in Nevada.

He reports that in Pahrump “the crowd went wild, or as wild as a group of sober Republicans can on a Monday night. They hooted and yelled and stomped their feet,” when Paul stated that there is no constitutional authority for a federal bank. Later, a Paul staffer confirmed to Tucker that “It’s our biggest applause line.”

Wow. Carlson has an explanation:

There are two ways to interpret a fact like that: Either the Ron Paul movement is more sophisticated than most journalists understand, or a lot of Paul supporters are eccentric bordering on bonkers.

I’ll go with the latter.

Whip Inflation Now, Mugabe Style

Any guess what the inflation rate in the once paradisiacal country of Zimbabwe was last month? 100%? 1,000%? 10,000%? I’ll have the probable answer in a minute.

It’s anyone’s guess, really, as the Times of London reports:

Zimbabwe can no longer calculate the rate of inflation because there are not enough goods left in the shops to allow price comparisons, the Central Statistical Office claimed yesterday.

Moffat Nyoni, the Director of the CSO, said that it had been impossible to compile reliable data for the past month because of “the unavailability of required information such as prices of goods, due to their shortage on the formal market”.

Robert Mugabe’s single-handed destruction of the former Rhodesia now appears to be nearly complete. Of course we’ve said that before, only to find that the inventive despot can find new ways to make things worse. He has won the record as the world’s current foremost example of why countries and markets should be free.

The inflation rate? Well, figures leaked to the paper peg it at 14,840%, up from 8,000% last month — this as the Carteresque Mugabe assures his countrymen nation of prisoners that his government is whipping inflation. At least that’s what he says when he’s not whipping the businessmen who refuse to go along with his solution to inflation: Forcing retail price drops below the cost of goods.

And you wonder why they can’t find enough goods on the shelves to get a reading of what the inflation rate is?

Mugabe takes not one whit of blame for this mess, blaming inflation instead on a conspiracy of Zimbabwe’s battered business community and the African version of the bogeyman — “Western governments” — who are conspiring to create economic chaos, forcing Mugabe from office.

That’s not a bad idea, actually, and I hope the CIA Africa desk at Langely is elbows deep in such a conspiracy … if indeed anyone but a nation’s leadership can manufacture inflation. I think that would be tough because inflation is, in one sense, a measure of a populace’s faith in its government; the higher the inflation, the lower the trust.

The solution, then, appears obvious: Change the government.

Of course we’ve said that before, too, only to find that the inventive despot can find new ways to hang onto power.

U.N. Honors The Dishonorable: Zimbabwe

The CIA World Factbook has this to say of Zimbabwe’s economy:

The government of Zimbabwe faces a wide variety of difficult economic problems as it struggles with an unsustainable fiscal deficit, an overvalued exchange rate, soaring inflation, and bare shelves. … The government’s land reform program, characterized by chaos and violence, has badly damaged the commercial farming sector, the traditional source of exports and foreign exchange and the provider of 400,000 jobs, turning Zimbabwe into a net importer of food products.

Badly needed support from the IMF has been suspended because of the government’s arrears on past loans, which it began repaying in 2005. The official annual inflation rate rose from 32% in 1998, to 133% in 2004, 585% in 2005, and approached 1000% in 2006, although private sector estimates put the figure much higher.

Robert Mugabe, the postergoon of despots grown long in the tooth who will do anything to cling to power, has made quite a mess of things, eh?

So what have the geniuses at the U.N. done? Slammed together yet another aid package? Negotiated yet another bail-out? No, of course not! This is the U.N., sillies.

No, in the hyper-bizarre mode that can only be the U.N.’s, Zimbabwe was elected today to head the U.N.’s Commission on Sustainable Economic Development. Well, why not give the position to a country that can’t sustain economic development itself? The election makes Zimbabwe’s Environment Minister Francis Nheme, which presents some problems:

Mr Nheme is the subject of European Union travel ban because he is a member of President Robert Mugabe’s government.

That means he cannot travel to the EU to meet ministers on commission business. (BBC)

The vote was 26-21, with most of the yeas other African nations.

There is one healthy part of the Zimbabwean economy: It is supplies women and children who are trafficked for forced labor and sexual exploitation. The U.N. has taken one of its classic “strong” stands against human trafficking, and has once again shown the power of its convictions by its vote today.

Mugabe Again Proves U.N.’s Weakness

This badly beaten face belongs to Morgan Tsvanvirai, a leader of the opposition to Robert Mugabe’s dictatorial regime in Zimbabwe.

His beating, following an anti-government demonstration, was so severe he suffered a skull fracture and needed transfusions due to internal bleeding, BBC reports.

The government blames the opposition — 49 of whom were arrested — for attacking police, who had to fight back, causing the injuries.

That’s interesting. You’d think federal prosecutors would show up in court if these folks attacked police, but no prosecutors were to be seen, so the 49 were released.

Correspondents covering the trial said there were an “astonishing” number of broken arms among the demonstrators, indicating a high level of physical violence occured in Zimbabwe’s police station.

Our reaction, stated by Condi Rice:

“The world community again has been shown that the regime of Robert Mugabe is ruthless and repressive and creates only suffering for the people of Zimbabwe.”

She’s right that the whole world has seen what a thug Mugabe is (again). The problem is that China sees but doesn’t care. It will continue to block UN efforts to protect Zimbabweans from Mugabe, proving once again the powerlessness of the world body.

Even South Africa, which to its great shame sells arms to Mugabe’s government, spoke out against Mugabe this time, but there was no condemnation from China. It will likely come, but it will be hollow, as Beijing will continue to support Mugabe politically and economically.

The U.N. is frozen, the African Union is powerless to do anything, and the world just watches. It would take U.S. troops a day to topple this piece of human slime. Unfortunately, the failure to secure Iraq has shown us that regime change is not a simple matter, so Mugabe sits content on his bloody throne.